946
edits
IDigBio Summit 2016: Difference between revisions
→Thursday, November 3, 2016 – Summit Day 2
| Line 580: | Line 580: | ||
[[Media:iDigBio_Summit-VI_Day_2_Effectively-Managing-Your-Digitization-Project.pdf | Food-for-Thought Presentation]]<br> | [[Media:iDigBio_Summit-VI_Day_2_Effectively-Managing-Your-Digitization-Project.pdf | Food-for-Thought Presentation]]<br> | ||
*iDigBio: Gil Nelson, David Jennings | *iDigBio: Gil Nelson, David Jennings | ||
*TCNs: Andy Miller (MiCC), Tom Nash (LBCC) Ben Brandt (SCAN, Lepnet) | *TCNs: Andy Miller (MiCC), Tom Nash (LBCC), Ben Brandt (SCAN, Lepnet) | ||
|[https://docs.google.com/document/d/15mqHOjelFeuKmjUrVt3lrmSqs2C1w25N_Olt0Y4rJJI/edit?usp=sharing Data quality for downstream use] | |[https://docs.google.com/document/d/15mqHOjelFeuKmjUrVt3lrmSqs2C1w25N_Olt0Y4rJJI/edit?usp=sharing Data quality for downstream use] | ||
During the ingestion of data from our many publishers, iDigBio standardizes certain data fields and provides data quality flags indicating potential issues for providers and data users. Which biodiversity data fields are increasingly being needed for research applications? Do standards, vocabularies, and data flags need to be updated or developed to help with improving data quality for downstream use? How can the ADBC community become more involved? | During the ingestion of data from our many publishers, iDigBio standardizes certain data fields and provides data quality flags indicating potential issues for providers and data users. Which biodiversity data fields are increasingly being needed for research applications? Do standards, vocabularies, and data flags need to be updated or developed to help with improving data quality for downstream use? How can the ADBC community become more involved? | ||