Coding Phenological Data from Herbarium Sheets: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(20 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 52: Line 52:
|-
|-
|-
|-
|style="vertical-align:top;"|10:15-11:35<br>11:15-11:35
|style="vertical-align:top;"|11:15-11:35<br>11:35-11:55
|rowspan="1" style="vertical-align:top; background-color::#eed1a9;"|Data standards community<br>•Darwin Core<br>•Apple Core
|rowspan="1" style="vertical-align:top; background-color::#eed1a9;"|Data standards community<br>•Darwin Core<br>•Apple Core
|John Wieczorek<br>James Macklin
|John Wieczorek<br>James Macklin
Line 73: Line 73:
|-
|-
|style="vertical-align:top;"|2:00-2:45 p.m.
|style="vertical-align:top;"|2:00-2:45 p.m.
|rowspan="1" colspan="2" style="vertical-align:top; background-color:#FFF8DC;"|Plenary Discussion
|rowspan="1" style="vertical-align:top; background-color:#FFF8DC;"|Plenary Discussion
|Jenn and Gil, moderate
|Jenn and Gil, moderate
|-
|-
Line 114: Line 114:
|-
|-
|-
|-
|style="vertical-align:top; text-align: left;"|9:00-11:00 a.m.
|style="vertical-align:top; text-align: left;"|9:00-9:30 a.m.
|rowspan="1" style="vertical-align:top; background-color:#FFF8DC;"|Breakout Session #2<br>Groups formed around taxonomic groups: Angiosperms, grasses/sedges/rushes, Gymnosperms, and others formed on day 1.<br>Vegetative scoring from sheets: Is this worth it?<br>Draft of pros/cons of using specimens for phenology research.<br>Draft methods recorded on how to score that group, what to prioritize.<br>Draft issues regarding phenology from specimens.
|rowspan="1" style="vertical-align:top; background-color:#FFF8DC;"|Breakout Session #2
Do our draft methods work?<br>By area of expertise<br>Data Standards<br>Collections<br>Research<br>Field Programs
|
|-
|-
|style="vertical-align:top;"|9:30-10:00 p.m.
|rowspan="1" style="vertical-align:top; background-color::#eed1a9;"|Regroup to address issues and break
|
|-
|-
|style="vertical-align:top;"|10:00-11:00 p.m.
|rowspan="1" style="vertical-align:top; background-color::#eed1a9;"|Breakout #3<br>1) Data Standards group<br>2) Database group<br><br>Groups formed around taxonomic groups:<br>3) “Normal” Angiosperms<br>4) Grasses/sedges/rushes<br>5) Gymnosperms<br>6) Wind-pollinated non-grasses<br>7) Other?
|
|
|-
|-
|-
|-
|style="vertical-align:top;"|11:00-12:00 p.m.
|style="vertical-align:top;"|11:00-12:00 p.m.
|rowspan="1" style="vertical-align:top; background-color::#eed1a9;"|Next steps forward with DarwinCore - <br>Set our DwC working group<br>Check in: Do our draft methods require revision?<br>How do our draft terms fit with current DwC?
|rowspan="1" style="vertical-align:top; background-color::#eed1a9;"|Next steps forward with DarwinCore - Set our DwC working group<br>Check in: Do our draft methods<br>require revision?<br>How do our draft terms fit with current DwC?
|John Wieczorek<br>James Macklin
|John Wieczorek<br>James Macklin
|-
|-
|-
|style="vertical-align:top;"|12:00-1:00 p.m.
|style="vertical-align:top;"|12:00-1:00 p.m.
Line 134: Line 144:
|-
|-
|style="vertical-align:top;"|2:00-3:00 p.m.
|style="vertical-align:top;"|2:00-3:00 p.m.
|rowspan="1" style="vertical-align:top; background-color:#FFF8DC;"|Mapping to Field Data - work in groups<br>(using Google sheet)
|rowspan="1" style="vertical-align:top; background-color:#FFF8DC;"|Breakout #4<br>1) Draft Introduction to justify our work<br>Draft finalized protocols<br>2) Draft Collections ISSUES document<br>3) Draft Research ISSUES document
<br>Mapping to Field Data - work in groups<br>4) BBCH term mapping<br>5) NPN term mapping
|
|
|-
|-
Line 206: Line 217:
|-
|-
|}
|}
==Workshop Participants==
*Alycia Crall, National Ecological Observatory Network
*Amanda Gallinat, Boston University
*Ashley Morris, Middle Tennessee State University, SouthEast Regional Network of Expertise and Collections (SERNEC)
*Ben Anhalt, Specify Database
*Brent Mishler, UC Berkeley, Consortium of California Herbaria (CCH)
*Brian Stucky, University of Florida, Plant Phenology Ontology
*Charlie Willis, Harvard University Herbaria
*Constantin Zohner, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
*Debra Trock, California Academy of Sciences
*David Baxter, UC Berkeley, CCH
*Edward Gilbert , Arizona State University, Symbiota
*Ellen Dean, UC Davis Herbarium
*Ellen Denny, USA National Phenology Network
*Elspeth Haston, The Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh
*Gil Nelson, Florida State University, iDigBio
*Greg Riccardi, Florida State University, iDigBio
*James Macklin, Agriculture and Agri-food Canada, Apple Core
*Jenn Yost, Cal Poly State University, San Luis Obispo
*Jillian Goodwin, Florida Museum of Natural History, iDigBio
*John Wieczorek, UC Berkeley, Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, Darwin Core Representative
*Katelin Stanley, Florida State University, WeDigBio
*Kevin Browne, University of California, Natural Reserve System
*Kjell Bolmgren, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PEP725 - Pan European Phenology Project
*Libby Ellwood, Florida State University, iDigBio
*Mare Nazaire, Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden
*Marie Keatley, University of Melbourne
*Michael Denslow, Appalachian State University (SERNEC), University of Florida (Notes from Nature)
*Natalie Rossington, UC Santa Barbara
*Pam Soltis, University of Florida, iDigBio
*Patrick Sweeney, Yale Peabody Museum of Natural History, Mobilizing New England Vascular Plant Specimen Data to Track Environmental Changes (NEVP)
*Ramona Walls, CyVerse, Plant Phenology Ontology
*Richard Carter, Valdosta State University
*Robert Guralnick, Florida Museum of Natural History
*Staci Markos, UC Berkeley, CCH
*Stanley Blum, Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG)
*Susan Mazer, UC Santa Barbara, National Phenology Network - California Phenology Project
*Tim Sparks, Coventry University

Navigation menu