Data Ingestion Guidance: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Trying to add requirement for eml file with each dataset.
(Trying to add requirement for eml file with each dataset.)
Line 43: Line 43:
Note to aggregated data providers (e.g., California Consortium of Herbaria (CCH), Calbug, Tri-Trophic TCN (TTD), Consortium of Pacific Northwest Herbaria (CPNW)):
Note to aggregated data providers (e.g., California Consortium of Herbaria (CCH), Calbug, Tri-Trophic TCN (TTD), Consortium of Pacific Northwest Herbaria (CPNW)):


When providing us access to your data, we highly encourage you to provide your aggregated data one provider at a time, each in their own Darwin Core archive, with their own list of contacts in a separate EML file. iDigBio is moving towards providing data quality feedback, data correction, annotations, and other value-added information back to the providers and thus we want individual contact information for each source provider where possible. The hope is that the information could be re-integrated at the source so that higher quality data would be in place for the provider as well as be available to downstream data consumers such as iDigBio and GBIF.
When providing us access to your data, we highly encourage you to provide your aggregated data one provider at a time, each in their own Darwin Core archive. Each dataset should be paired with a separate EML file that includes the metadata about the dataset (such as a list of contacts). iDigBio is moving towards providing data quality feedback, data correction, annotations, and other value-added information back to the providers and thus we want individual contact information for each source provider where possible. The hope is that the information could be re-integrated at the source so that higher quality data would be in place for the provider as well as be available to downstream data consumers such as iDigBio and GBIF.


However, if that is not possible or desirable, we still welcome your aggregated data as one monolith.
However, if that is not possible or desirable, we still welcome your aggregated data as one monolith.
1,554

edits

Navigation menu