IDigBio Summit 2016: Difference between revisions

Line 534: Line 534:
Now that ADBC is in its sixth year and the number of institutions digitizing collections has expanded exponentially, many collections are using past experiences  and future needs to refine digitization goals. In this session, we will discuss and reflect on how institutions prioritize digitization activities. What factors go into making selections about which specimens to digitize next? How do gaps in currently available digital data impact what institutions choose to digitize? What strategies have been used to make prioritizations? Should prioritizations be limited to individual institutional goals, or are there methods for collaborative prioritization across a network of institutions? What strategies have been developed for tracking digitization success?
Now that ADBC is in its sixth year and the number of institutions digitizing collections has expanded exponentially, many collections are using past experiences  and future needs to refine digitization goals. In this session, we will discuss and reflect on how institutions prioritize digitization activities. What factors go into making selections about which specimens to digitize next? How do gaps in currently available digital data impact what institutions choose to digitize? What strategies have been used to make prioritizations? Should prioritizations be limited to individual institutional goals, or are there methods for collaborative prioritization across a network of institutions? What strategies have been developed for tracking digitization success?


*iDigBio: Gil Nelson, Matt Collins, Shelley James, Deb Paul
*iDigBio: Gil Nelson, Matt Collins, Shelley James, Deborah Paul
*TCNs: Rich Rabeler (GLI)
*TCNs: Rich Rabeler (GLI)
|[https://docs.google.com/document/d/15TPeowikuKqe8qfYyiZtan7EeDZ-RxGVFBXhOMJBm3o/edit?usp=sharing Data Quality]
|[https://docs.google.com/document/d/15TPeowikuKqe8qfYyiZtan7EeDZ-RxGVFBXhOMJBm3o/edit?usp=sharing Data Quality]
946

edits