1,774
edits
ADBC Summit 2018: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 414: | Line 414: | ||
| '''Specify Collections Consortium II''' (Jim Beach) | | '''Specify Collections Consortium II''' (Jim Beach) | ||
| '''Communicating with Administrators''' (Gil Nelson & David Jennings) | | '''Communicating with Administrators''' (Gil Nelson & David Jennings) | ||
| | | '''Innovation & Unconference''' (Deborah Paul)<br> | ||
Bring your inspirations from recent experiences, conversations. and presentations at ADBC Summit 8 to this breakout. We will gather ideas and find others with innovative ideas and expertise to share. An unconference gives you the chance to design your own breakout and bring timely topics that are on your mind - to a larger group. | |||
|} | |} | ||
|- style="vertical-align: top;" | |- style="vertical-align: top;" | ||
| Line 434: | Line 435: | ||
Quality data is essential as a foundation for analytical, synthetic, and AI research. Anyone providing data to an aggregator or downloading data from an aggregator can make use of the data quality feedback offered. If you use this information, we would like to hear about how you use it (or not) and ways in which all of us can work on improving data quality (dq). From researcher, policy maker, graduate student, collection manager, curator, educator, and museum director, we all have a role to play. We also plan to share some of what we learned from a recent survey and symposium at SPNHC-TDWGNZ -- on this topic. And, we'll share some ideas for possible future changes to dq feedback from iDigBio as well as recent progress from the TDWG Data Quality Interest Group and iDigBio implementation plans. | Quality data is essential as a foundation for analytical, synthetic, and AI research. Anyone providing data to an aggregator or downloading data from an aggregator can make use of the data quality feedback offered. If you use this information, we would like to hear about how you use it (or not) and ways in which all of us can work on improving data quality (dq). From researcher, policy maker, graduate student, collection manager, curator, educator, and museum director, we all have a role to play. We also plan to share some of what we learned from a recent survey and symposium at SPNHC-TDWGNZ -- on this topic. And, we'll share some ideas for possible future changes to dq feedback from iDigBio as well as recent progress from the TDWG Data Quality Interest Group and iDigBio implementation plans. | ||
| '''Broadening Participation''' (Molly Phillips & Kari Jordan) | | '''Broadening Participation''' (Molly Phillips & Kari Jordan) | ||
| | | | ||
|} | |} | ||
|- style="vertical-align: top;" | |- style="vertical-align: top;" | ||