Should we consider adding a three-column table that shows the complete mapping of DwC, API, and Elasticsearch field names? is this even possible?
| Darwin Core (DwC) | iDigBio API | iDigBio Elasticsearch Index |
|---|---|---|
| "dwc:scientificName" | "idigbio:data" : {"dwc:scientificName"} | scientificname |
"barcodevalue" "catalognumber" "class" "collectioncode" "collectionid" "collectionname" "collector" "commonname" "continent" "country" "county" "datecollected" "datemodified" "etag" "family" "fieldnumber" "genus" "geopoint" "hasImage" "highertaxon" "infraspecificepithet" "institutioncode" "institutionid" "institutionname" "kingdom" "locality" "maxdepth" "maxelevation" "mediarecords" "mindepth" "minelevation" "municipality" "occurenceid" "order" "phylum" "recordset" "scientificname" "specificepithet" "stateprovince" "typestatus" "uuid" "verbatimlocality" "version" "waterbody"
-dstoner